POLITICS
Teachers, scroll down for a quick list of key resources in our Teachers Toolkit, and be sure to vote in today’s poll.

Photograph by Steve Raymer, National Geographic
Discussion Ideas
- The Los Angeles Times article says Russia “had its own version of the Confederate monument problem.” What is the “Confederate monument problem”?
- The “Confederate monument problem” describes debate in the U.S. over placement and support of monuments to the Confederate States of America—the southern states that seceded and prompted the Civil War. Some monuments honor individuals or groups of individuals, while others (like the statue toppled in Durham, North Carolina, this summer) are monuments to the Confederacy itself and those who served it.
- Critics of public placement of Confederate monuments object to what the monuments represent—post-war support for racism and an armed uprising against the rule of law in the United States.
- Supporters of public placement of Confederate monuments say such monuments commemorate a crucial part of U.S. history and honor the ancestry of Confederate descendants.
- Confederate monuments are coming down all over the U.S.—although others are still being erected.
- The “Confederate monument problem” describes debate in the U.S. over placement and support of monuments to the Confederate States of America—the southern states that seceded and prompted the Civil War. Some monuments honor individuals or groups of individuals, while others (like the statue toppled in Durham, North Carolina, this summer) are monuments to the Confederacy itself and those who served it.
- What was Russia’s version of the “Confederate monument problem”?
- Thousands of statues, monuments, and plaques honoring Communist leaders and ideas became politically irrelevant following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.
- Critics objected to public placement of monuments to people and ideas associated with mass killings, famine, and brutal authoritarianism.
- Supporters maintained that the monuments represented a crucial part of Russian history—the brief history of the Soviet Union itself.
- Thousands of statues, monuments, and plaques honoring Communist leaders and ideas became politically irrelevant following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.
- How did Russia deal with its “Confederate monument problem”?
- In many ways, it is still dealing with the problem.
- Thousands of statues still stand in Russia and other former Soviet states, such as Ukraine, Georgia, and Kazakhstan. Most monuments stand neglected or vandalized, but some are beautifully maintained.
- Some Russian nationalists are rehabilitating the reputations of leaders such as Josef Stalin and Vladimir Lenin, and have erected new statues to them.
- In Moscow, hundreds of statues have been relocated to the largest open-air sculpture garden in Russia, the Muzeon. The Muzeon is a popular public park, with space for art exhibitions, concert venues, playground equipment, bike trails, skateboard pavilions, benches and picnic areas, lakes, ping-pong and chess tables, and paved paths between museums and other parks.
- The Muzeon is often called “Fallen Monument Park.” This title is both figurative and literal. Many statues sustained damage during the 1991 move to the Muzeon, and have not been repaired.
- In many ways, it is still dealing with the problem.
- How do statues in the Muzeon address their controversial Communist legacy?
- They don’t, really. The author of this thought-provoking essay says, “Each statue or set of statues is accompanied by a panel that informs the viewer about the work, its composition and the history of its display. Notably, there is little about the leader being portrayed in the text. Each description ends with, ‘By the decree of the Moscow City Council of People Representatives of Oct. 24, 1991, the monument was dismantled and placed in the MUSEON Arts Park exposition. The work is historically and culturally significant, being the memorial construction of the Soviet era, on the themes of politics and ideology.’ The point, of course, is that the Moscow city council is careful to state that the display is not intended to glorify the past, but to document it.”
- The park is very popular with both locals and tourists. The same essay asks, “Why do these scenes, these dead Soviet statues, work so well? I would assert that by locating them together, they can be put into “historical and cultural” context, as the markers suggest. Moreover, through strategic curation, these statues have been put into dialogue with each other and with the contemporary sculptures around them and been given new meaning.”
- They don’t, really. The author of this thought-provoking essay says, “Each statue or set of statues is accompanied by a panel that informs the viewer about the work, its composition and the history of its display. Notably, there is little about the leader being portrayed in the text. Each description ends with, ‘By the decree of the Moscow City Council of People Representatives of Oct. 24, 1991, the monument was dismantled and placed in the MUSEON Arts Park exposition. The work is historically and culturally significant, being the memorial construction of the Soviet era, on the themes of politics and ideology.’ The point, of course, is that the Moscow city council is careful to state that the display is not intended to glorify the past, but to document it.”
- Baltimore Mayor Catherine Pugh, who just removed four Confederate monuments from the city, comments on the “Confederate monument problem”: “They’re coming down so fast, I don’t know if we have enough museums to house them or enough cemeteries to stick them in.” Where would you put Confederate monuments? Vote in our poll!
TEACHERS TOOLKIT
Los Angeles Times: Russia had its own version of the Confederate monument problem. The solution: a sculpture park in Moscow
Houston Chronicle: What Russia can teach us about Confederate statues
Nat Geo: Where Would You Put Confederate Monuments?
Nat Geo: Boundary Between the Union and the Confederacy
Wikipedia: List of monuments and memorials of the Confederate States of America
One thought on “How Russia Handled Its Own Monument Problem”